PDA

View Full Version : Romo or Bledsoe?


football junkie
10-25-2006, 08:26 PM
I checked the Dallas forum and there is nothing on this there so I think it's safe to bring out to the main forum. What does everybody think about Drew Bledsoe's mid-game demotion and Tony Romo now being the man in Big D?

Bledsoe, 34, is certainly having the worst year of his career. His QB Rating is the lowest it has been since 1995 -- when he was still learning to play the position. He's been sacked 16 times in five and half games and he's thrown more interceptions than touchdowns. I think it's safe to say that his play in week one against Jacksonville and his play in week five against Philadelphia personally cost (3-3) Dallas wins in both those games.

But is Tony Romo the solution?

Romo, 26, the Eastern Illinios University product has been a Cowboy for four years. In very limited sample regular season playing time he has produced decent numbers during mop up duty. But the real push to get Romo the job comes from his pre-season performance in 2006. The main problem with that, as I don't need to tell any real football fan, is that pre-season stats are meaningless. Romo was playing against second and third-string players and against simplified defensive packages. Regular season game time is a lot different as can be evinced by Romo's play in the second half of Monday night's game when he tossed three interceptions and was sacked twice. He also threw two touchdowns -- one of which was completely meaningless and at the end of the game.

So let's look at this in a completely unscientific, and possibly illogical, way.

Bledsoe
Pros: Big Arm, he can make any throw; Veteran Status, has played 14 years in the NFL; Past Success, lead the Patriots to a Superbowl (loss) and was Tom Brady's back up during another Patriots' Superbowl (win).
Cons: He's a statue, completely lacks pocket mobility; Gun Fighter Syndrome, throws balls he shouldn't because he think's his arm in 10 years younger; History of Injury, if this weren't true Tom Brady wouldn't be a three time Superbowl Champion.

Romo
Pros: Rocket Arm, Romo can absolutely make every throw any offensive co-ordinator could request; Youth, a 26-year-old body can usually withstand the rigors of an NFL schedule better than a player almost ten years older; Knowledge of the Offense, Romo has quietly been in Big D for four years now; Command and Presence, when he's in the huddle or playing the game he virtually exudes confidence.
Cons: Lack of experience, he has 27 career attempts and is ostensibly a rookie on the field; Divided Locker room, this mid-season, mid-game QB change is sure to divide the Dallas locker room; he sometimes makes what appear to be absent-minded plays and you just scratch you head and wonder; has never started or played in a road game.

Bill Parcells being the genius or mad-genius that he is decided to officially make this change at halftime on Monday Night Football, at home, against a division rival.

Romo and Big D now go on the road for three straight weeks, at Carolina, at Washington, and at Arizona. Then the team gets to come home and host Indianapolis. We're going to know what mettle Romo is made of after that schedule of contests.

Do you think Romo is the right man to lead Big D? Do you think Parcells made a huge mistake making the QB change when he did? Do you think the change was long overdue?

ChrisLDuncan
10-26-2006, 12:37 AM
Well I still haven't forgiven Bledsoe for throwing two pics (ESPECIALLY THE ONE WHERE TO WAS WIDE OPEN) in the red zone in the last eight minutes of the game. I mean Bledsoe reminds me too much of Danny White (BIGGEST LOOSER EVER) so I for sure say give the ball to Romo. I mean he hasn't thrown a pic in the endzone to end the game yet. So why not.

efin98
10-26-2006, 03:34 AM
Parcells may know Bledsoe better than any head coach(his sixth season, longest under any) but even the Big Tuna can't stop his inevitable decline. Bledsoe's days in the league are numbered. Romo is the future of the team.

Bledsoe is harming the team more than helping them. Romo may make rookie mistakes but the season is still young enough for him to bounce back and the NFC is weak enough for Dallas to take a hit and still have a shot at the playoffs.

ChrisLDuncan
10-26-2006, 01:38 PM
Parcells may know Bledsoe better than any head coach(his sixth season, longest under any) but even the Big Tuna can't stop his inevitable decline. Bledsoe's days in the league are numbered. Romo is the future of the team.

Bledsoe is harming the team more than helping them. Romo may make rookie mistakes but the season is still young enough for him to bounce back and the NFC is weak enough for Dallas to take a hit and still have a shot at the playoffs.

Not to mention that Dallas' D is good enough to to keep them there.

brady_branch
10-27-2006, 05:29 PM
Dallas? Pffffft. Sure, Romo might take them to the playoffs, but who cares that's not a Cowboy fan? This should really be in the Cowboys forum.

Anyway, I chose the last option. The Eagles and Giants just look too good.

racosun
10-30-2006, 11:52 AM
Romo played pretty well in his first start this season for the 'Boys, completing 24-of-36 passes for 270 yards, a touchdown, and a pick. That's pretty efficient, and it's probably better than what Bledsoe could have done. Not to mention that the Big Tuna and TO were sharing a few laughs on the sideline near the end of the 35-14 blowout. It could be possible that this QB switch just may save the season for Dallas, although it's still too early to tell. They looked good, though, after some early jitters.

football junkie
10-30-2006, 02:19 PM
Romo appears to have solidified his position as "The Man" in Big-D. 35 unanswered points scored, are you kidding me?

This is what happens when you don't have a statue playing QB. Romo's mobility frees up TE Jason Witten, a dangerous receiver, from a lot of his blocking duties and puts him one-on-one against linebackers and that's just not a battle many linebackers are going to win. The same goes for Marion Barber, did you see him running wild? I think this move totally re-invents the Cowboys' offense. And I think you're absolutely right Racosun, this move may have saved their season.

And I don't think this thread should be in the Cowboy's forum because no one there was writing about it and the Cowboys's are "America's team." Plus mid-season QB changes are interesting no matter what team is involved.

How about David Carr getting benched yesterday for Sage Rosenfels? Jeepers.

BTW...Packer Backer, looks like you were definitely right on the timing issue. I had my doubts. Not about Romo but about the timing. They still have a hard road ahead. The Giants are going to take the East. And the Eagles organization after two heart-breaking losses seems to be shooting itself in both feet. Big-D is still alive.

brady_branch
10-30-2006, 03:35 PM
And I don't think this thread should be in the Cowboy's forum because no one there was writing about it and the Cowboys's are "America's team." Plus mid-season QB changes are interesting no matter what team is involved.

I still disagree with the first part. Though nobody ever posts in the Cowboy forum, so it's a little more acceptable. The Cowboys are no longer "America's Team". That honor belongs to the Saints, at least for now. Mid-season QB changes are interesting when it's a highly-touted rookie, but I really don't care about Tony Romo.

football junkie
10-31-2006, 08:38 PM
I remind you that Joe Montana was not a highly-touted rookie, when he took over for incumbent Steve Deberg. Montana was a third round draft pick and barely played in his first season. And Montana is in Canton.

Steve Young was highly-touted but certainly not a rookie when he took over for Joe Montana. And Young is in Canton.

Jeff Garcia certainly wasn't highly-touted when he took over for Steve Young. Garcia wasn't even drafted! And he went to three straight Pro-Bowls.

Again Kurt Warner wasn't a highly-touted rookie when he took over for Trent Green. And Warner won two NFL MVPs.

And you of all people should appreciate this, Tom Brady, wasn't a highly touted rookie when he replaced Drew Bledsoe. Brady didn't even start in college and he's a two-time Superbowl MVP.

All those no-ones share nine Superbowl Trophies, I think five Superbowl MVPS, and too many NFL MVPs and Pro-Bowl selections to count.

Now I'm not saying that Romo is going to have a career like that but you never know and that's what makes it all so interesting.

Snake
11-01-2006, 12:13 AM
And you of all people should appreciate this, Tom Brady, wasn't a highly touted rookie when he replaced Drew Bledsoe. Brady didn't even start in college and he's a two-time Superbowl MVP.


Heh, that's kind of stretching it FJ. Even though Carr would not officially name Brady the starter, everyone knew he was the man. Henson didn't get that much playing time from him. Brady's junior year he threw at a 61% completion rate for over 2,600 yds and 15 tds. His senior year, splitting playing time, he threw at a 63% comlpetion rate with just under 2,600 yards and 20 touchdowns, the yardage and touchdown numbers for his senior year were the both the 3rd best by any Michigan QB. In my opinion, the only thing that hurt Brady's stock was Carr trying to please the younger Henson, so that he would stay at Michigan and not bolt off completely to baseball.

brady_branch
11-01-2006, 02:43 PM
I remind you that Joe Montana was not a highly-touted rookie, when he took over for incumbent Steve Deberg. Montana was a third round draft pick and barely played in his first season. And Montana is in Canton.

Steve Young was highly-touted but certainly not a rookie when he took over for Joe Montana. And Young is in Canton.

Jeff Garcia certainly wasn't highly-touted when he took over for Steve Young. Garcia wasn't even drafted! And he went to three straight Pro-Bowls.

Again Kurt Warner wasn't a highly-touted rookie when he took over for Trent Green. And Warner won two NFL MVPs.

And you of all people should appreciate this, Tom Brady, wasn't a highly touted rookie when he replaced Drew Bledsoe. Brady didn't even start in college and he's a two-time Superbowl MVP.

All those no-ones share nine Superbowl Trophies, I think five Superbowl MVPS, and too many NFL MVPs and Pro-Bowl selections to count.

Now I'm not saying that Romo is going to have a career like that but you never know and that's what makes it all so interesting.

It's interesting, but it doesn't belong in CE. It belongs in the Cowboy forum. That's all I've got to say.

football junkie
11-05-2006, 07:26 PM
Despite the Dallas loss this week, Romo tossed two touchdowns to zero interceptions. Romo was 24/36 for 7.9 yards per attempt and 284 yards overall.

He can also stretch the field vertically, connecting with Patrick Crayton on a 48-yard pass. Romo's in-game QB Rating was 109.0. I think the kid from Eastern Illinois is going to be the bright shining star in Dallas for years to come.

The NFL has found a new star.

ATLFalcons
11-05-2006, 07:52 PM
I have to say Romo, before the game against the Giants I had no idea who he was. I actually thought they were talking about Bill Romanowski!! I don't no why I thought that, but he's shown he can be a good quarterback in the NFL.

football junkie
11-24-2006, 01:57 PM
Wow, Romo fired five touchdowns yesterday against Tampa Bay. The week before he went 10 of 11 in the second half against the Colts. This guy doesn't rattle.

It looks like Bill Parcells has found himself another winner. The Bledsoe vs. Romo question is, I believe, settled.

This might work out extremely well for Dallas, remember the last time Bledsoe lost his job to somebody (Tom Brady), that team went a Superbowl run.

ATLFalcons
11-24-2006, 10:28 PM
I think Dallas can actually contend for the Super Bowl out of the NFC. Most NFC teams haven't been consistent enough to warrant a playoff berth yet and lately the Cowboys have looked good.